Investments may need clearance under 'vague' TPR code

By 2009-02-26T14:15:00

[15:15 CET 26-02] UK – The Pension Regulator's (TPR) draft code of practice on the 'material detriment' test is "too vague" and could lead to pension schemes requiring clearance on normal business activity such as changes in investment strategy, consulting firm Mercer has warned.

You have now reached your article limit

Already a registered user or member? Sign in here

To continue reading, register free today for access

Register Now

Registration also includes access to

IPE Real Assets

Gated access promo

Five reasons to register today

  1. Access to IPE articles from our award-winning editorial team
  2. Unique IPE market data, rankings and tables
  3. In-depth interviews with pension fund leaders
  4. Extensive coverage of latest asset class trends
  5. Comprehensive archive of data, research and intelligence