IASB's management commentary project faces identity crisis

Andreas Barckow at IASB

Any regular follower of the International Accounting Standards Board is probably familiar with a particular recurring nightmare. It starts with good intentions but spirals into shifting project goals, missed targets, and unquantifiable hours of wasted time. Perhaps you awoke during July to find yourself observing the board’s July discussion of its management commentary project.

This content is only available to IPE Members

Already an IPE Member? Sign in here

Unlock your IPE Membership Package

For unlimited access to IPE’s industry-leading market intelligence, comprising news, data and long-form content on European pensions and institutional investment.

What type of organisation do you work for?

Join now

  • Secure online payment
  • Free European delivery
  • Best value for price
 
access-denied-testimonial

IPE covers a good variety of very current and relevant topics. It is good to read the high-level, independent and objective perspectives from pension funds in other European countries; many of them are dealing with the same issues as we are, so it is interesting to learn from their experiences, especially when they are ahead of where we are on the curve.

Markus Schaen , Senior Fund Manager, MN,
The Netherlands